by John McCoy

We have shown how the negative forces are in control of the entire Earth. It is probably obvious to most of you by now. However, some will think it is meant that there is a vast network of underlings and a vast communications system through which many receive their orders. Some will place the so-called newspaper censorship of flying saucers at the door of the internationalists. They may think that each editor of a large newspaper receives his daily “orders” from the offices of top conspirators. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Those controlling the world have their only safety in making the people think that they are self-controlled. Never would they be so public as to threaten large numbers of individuals. They are responsible for the suppression of flying saucer information from all sources, nevertheless. They are directly keeping the governmental channels devoid of any admissions of the interplanetary nature of the UFO. And they are responsible for closing the public’s mind to the existence of the extraterrestrial visitors also. Yet, they do not issue orders to editors and other individuals of a similar status. They covertly close the mass mind by cleverly inducing the dialectic materialism of Marx and Wundt—the belief that man is but mud and we should eat, drink and be merry because one of these tomorrows we may die. They subtly, over the years, beginning in childhood, initiate the individual into the concepts which are necessary for him to be enslaved. (more…)

by John McCoy

Perhaps the greatest enigma in flying saucer research is the seeming contradictions among the stories of the various saucer contactees. This is always an excellent point for an individual with the “will not to believe” to bring up in debating the saucer subject. We all are aware enough of the fact that when a story is passed from one person to another, many changes of both a minor and occasionally a major nature are bound to occur. Also it would be impossible to perfectly duplicate everything one saw aboard a spaceship or for that matter in a modern factory. To interpret correctly what we saw would be an even more difficult task. Probably the following story (fictional) is the best example of the reasons for many of the seeming contradictions. It seems a space ship came to Earth and the captain sent three men out separately to its surface to investigate it. When they reported back this is what they said. The first reported that it was extremely cold on the Earth, that everyone wore heavy furs, ate whale blubber and lived in ice houses. He had landed in northern Alaska. The second said that it was a very hot and tropical place with a good deal of moisture. All the natives went about almost naked, were black and killed a variety of wild animals for food. Their houses were of grass. This fellow had landed in Africa. The third spaceman landed in New York! You can well imagine that his description of what he saw was sufficient to cause even more confusion than the reports of his two fellow “reporters”. Thus we see perhaps a little more lucidly just why some reports may be a little contradictory and diversified. Indeed, if they were not, then this would be the time to cry “Hoax!” (more…)

by John W. Dean

I think that the first I ever heard or read of remote controlled disks was when they were seen frequently during World War 2 and were called “foo-fighters”. It was only logical that they should be considered dangerous. Not much was told about their size that could be relied upon—reports ranged from eight inches to ten feet in diameter. Adamski, aboard a mother ship, said he saw one sent out and then saw it return, but had no idea as to its operation nor did he learn what message it brought back.

When Howard Menger spoke in Chicago, he told us about one, and I asked him if he saw the “record”, assuming that it would be round like a common phonograph record and, when played, would repeat, in words, any conversation it had heard. He said it was flat and square or rectangular (film?) and that he did not hear it “played”. (more…)