by Mark M. Rich

Introduction

Over a period of decades some vaccines have been found to be contaminated with live viruses. It is implied that these have been a series of accidents. Now that we have detected a population control agenda, these events take on a new meaning. A brief description follows.

Simian Virus

Simian virus 40 (SV40) is a polyomavirus found in monkeys and humans. Because this virus has been detected in a variety of human cancers, including lymphatic, brain, lung, and bone, medical researchers have concluded that it is a cancer-causing virus. These cancers have increased tremendously in recent decades.

In 1954 a bacteriologist named Dr. Bernice Eddy found that the polio vaccines were contaminated with a live monkey virus, which caused paralysis when injected into monkeys. Rather than being rewarded, the NIH demoted Dr. Eddy for her discovery. She continued her work independently, however, and announced in 1961 that what she had discovered in 1954 was definitely the cancer-causing SV40. Her discovery was later validated by Dr. Maurice Hilliman of Merck.

For years, independent medical researchers warned that polio vaccines have been infecting people with the SV40. Unfortunately, they were ridiculed. In 1994, Loyola University researcher, Dr. Michele Carbone, discovered the SV40 in about 50% of the human lung tumors he observed. His finding would eventually be replicated by 60 different laboratories in multiple countries.

During the 1950s and 1960s alone, about 98 million people in the US were injected with these contaminated polio vaccines. Some have suggested that these vaccines may have been administered up to 1999.

It was reported by United Press International in October of 2004 that the SV40 was accidentally placed in the polio vaccines because the manufacturer, Wyeth-Lederle, may not have taken all of the safety precautions.

Porcine Virus

In March of 2010 the FDA discontinued GSK’s oral rotavirus vaccine Rotarix after an independent laboratory found that it was contaminated with a pig virus known as porcine circovirus. In swine this virus is known to induce sudden death, enlarged lymph nodes, stunted growth, jaundice, skin rashes, breathing difficulties, and stomach ulcers.

Rotavirus vaccines are usually given to infants starting at 2, 4, then 6 months of age. The FDA and GSK said there was no cause for concern because there are no known health risk to humans. However, this is not because the agency has conducted studies to determine that there are no health risks. The FDA claims this virus doesn’t affect humans because no such studies have been done.

The FDA ruled in May of the same year that doctors should continue pushing the vaccine because there was no evidence that it was harmful to humans. Although FDA spokespeople said they’d be looking into it, no reason was given for the contamination, leaving us to conclude that it was simply a mistake.

H5N1

In February of 2009 Baxter was caught shipping the live H5N1 Avian Flu virus in its H3N2 seasonal flu vaccines to 18 countries. The contamination, which took place at Baxter’s research facility in Orth-Donau, Austria, was discovered by the National Microbiology Laboratory in Canada. This deadly virus has a kill-rate of 60%.

Baxter spokespeople referred to it as a “technical” error. The independent media sources, Prison Planet and Natural News, suggest otherwise.

Although the H5N1 doesn’t spread well through the air, if combined with the airborne seasonal flu virus, it could spread quickly, acting as a deadly airborne biological weapon. Baxter International adheres to a set of bio-safety protocols that are designed to make this type of contamination virtually impossible.

If this deadly virus was not detected it would have caused a pandemic, which, says Adams, would have sold an enormous amount of vaccines. “Spreading bird flu is a clever way to create demand for bird flu vaccines,” he acknowledged, “and we’ve all seen very clearly how drug companies first market the problem and then leap to the rescue by selling the solution.”

HIV

It was mentioned in the London Times in May of 1987 that the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was spread through the smallpox vaccine during one of the WHO’s decade-long campaigns in Brazil and Haiti, as well as African countries such as Zaire, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Malawi, Rwanda, and Burundi.

The vaccines used during the 1978 hepatitis B vaccination campaign run by the WHO and NIH were also found to be contaminated with HIV. These injections were administered to men in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Houston, Denver, and Chicago.

It was reported by CBS News in February of 2009 that Bayer kept selling its hemophiliac medication in the mid 1980s after it was found to be contaminated with HIV. After the virus was discovered in its product, Bayer continued to sell it for at least a year in countries such as China, Taiwan, Argentina, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, France, and Spain.

Cervical Cancer

A group that offers scientific studies on vaccinations known as Safe, Affordable, Necessary and Effective Vaccines (SANE VAX) collected a variety of Gardasil samples from New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Poland, France, and the US, and sent them to the Milford Hospital in Connecticut to be examined by pathologists.

SANE reported in September of 2011 that all samples had the recombinant DNA (rDNA) of HPV-11 and HPV-18. In other words, the vaccines contained a genetically modified version of the exact virus they had allegedly been created to defend against.

Because of its potential toxicity, rDNA is considered a biohazard by the NIH. The normal and common HPV virus only stays in the bloodstream for a short period. However, the genetically engineered rDNA of the HPV contained in the Gardasil vaccine is unnatural. It is, therefore, unknown how long it remains or whether or not it mutates.

All vials contained the genetically modified HPV. So it has been determined that this version of the virus must be placed in the vaccines during the manufacturing process.

On August 29, 2011, SANE president Norma Erickson sent a letter detailing these results to the FDA, stating: “Because one hundred percent of the samples tested were positive for HPV DNA contamination, SANE Vax requests the FDA investigate the extent of the HPV DNA contamination in the Gardasil HPV4 vaccine currently on the market.”

The FDA responded in September of that year: “We have evaluated the concerns conveyed to us in your letter. We have determined that Gardasil is not contaminated with HPV DNA and remains a safe and effective vaccine.”

per Children’s Health Defense: Gardasil Vaccine Injuries

Excerpt from Invisible Eugenics

Contamination In The Covid-19 Shots

As it turns out, spike protein and the mRNA are not the only hazards of these injections. McKernan’s team have also discovered simian virus 40 (SV40) promoters that, for decades, have been suspected of causing cancer in humans, including mesotheliomas, lymphomas and cancers of the brain and bone. The findings were posted on OSF Preprints in early April 2023. As explained in the abstract:

“Several methods were deployed to assess the nucleic acid composition of four expired vials of the Moderna and Pfizer bivalent mRNA vaccines. Two vials from each vendor were evaluated … Multiple assays support DNA contamination that exceeds the European Medicines Agency (EMA) 330ng/mg requirement and the FDAs 10ng/dose requirements …”

As noted by Greer, this means that governments and drug companies “have misled the world to a far greater extent than previously known.” If these findings are correct, it would also mean that “the so-called ‘vaccines’ are actually altering the human genome and causing permanent production of the deadly spike protein,” and this internal production of spike protein would, in turn, “trigger the immune system to attack its own cells,” Greer says.

In the interview, McKernan explains how the DNA contaminants found in the COVID jabs can result in the genetic modification of the human genome, and Bhakdi reviews how and why the shots can trigger autoimmune diseases.

Background: What Is SV40?

In 2002, the Lancet published evidence linking polio vaccines contaminated with SV40 to Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. According to the authors, the vaccine may be responsible for up to half the 55,000 Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma cases diagnosed each year.

How did this simian (monkey) virus get into the human population? According to the late Dr. Maurice Hilleman, a leading vaccine developer, Merck inadvertently unleashed the virus via their polio vaccine. It’s unclear exactly when SV40 was eliminated from the polio vaccine. The timing also varies from country to country. For example, SV40-contaminated polio vaccines were administered in Italy as recently as 1999.

As reported in a Lancet book review of “The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of a Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus, Contaminated Polio Vaccine and the Millions of Americans Exposed”:

“By 1960, scientists and vaccine manufacturers knew that monkey kidneys were sewers of simian viruses. Such contamination often spoiled cultures, including those of an NIH researcher named Bernice Eddy, who worked on vaccine safety … Her discovery … threatened one of the USA’s most important public-health programs …

Eddy tried to get word out to colleagues but was muzzled and stripped of her vaccine regulatory duties and her laboratory … [Two] Merck researchers, Ben Sweet and Maurice Hilleman, soon identified the rhesus virus later named SV40 — the carcinogenic agent that had eluded Eddy.

In 1963, U.S. authorities decided to switch to African green monkeys, which are not natural hosts of SV40, to produce polio vaccine. In the mid-1970s, after limited epidemiological studies, authorities concluded that although SV40 caused cancer in hamsters, it didn’t seem to do so in people.

Fast forward to the 1990s: Michele Carbone, then at NIH, was working on how SV40 induces cancers in animals. One of these was mesothelioma, a rare cancer of the pleura thought in people to be caused mainly by asbestos. The orthodoxy held that SV40 didn’t cause human cancers.

Emboldened by a 1992 NEJM paper that found DNA ‘footprints’ of SV40 in childhood brain tumors, Carbone tested human mesothelioma tumor biopsies at the National Cancer Institute: 60% contained SV40 DNA. In most, the monkey virus was active and producing proteins.

He published his results in Oncogene in May, 1994, but the NIH declined to publicize them … Carbone … moved to Loyola University. There he discovered how SV40 disables tumor suppressor genes in human mesothelioma, and published his results in Nature Medicine in July, 1997. Studies in Italy, Germany, and the USA also showed associations between SV40 and human cancers.”

mRNA COVID Jabs Contaminated With Double-Stranded DNA

With that background, let’s get back to McKernan’s findings, which in addition to the featured video are also discussed in Daniel Horowitz’s podcast above. In short, his team discovered elevated levels of double-stranded DNA plasmids, including SV40 promoters (DNA sequence that is essential for gene expression) that are known to trigger cancer development when encountering an oncogene (a gene that has the potential to cause cancer).

The level of contamination varies depending on the platform used to measure it, but no matter which method is used, the level of DNA contamination is significantly higher than the regulatory limits in both Europe and the U.S., McKernan says. The highest level of DNA contamination found was 30%, which is rather astounding.

As explained by McKernan, when using a typical PCR test, you’ll be considered positive if the test detects the SARS-CoV-2 virus using a cycle threshold (CT) of about 40. In comparison, the DNA contamination is detected at CTs below 20.

That means the contamination is a million-fold greater than the amount of virus you’d need to have in order to test positive for COVID. “So, there’s an enormous difference here with regards to the amount of material that’s in there,” McKernan says.

In his Substack article, he also points out that people who argue that double-stranded DNA and viral RNA is a false equivalency because viral RNA is replication competent, are wrong.

“The majority of the sgRNA you are detecting in a nasal swab in your nose is NOT REPLICATION COMPETENT as shown in Jaafar et al. It is just an RNA fragment that should have lower longevity in your cells than dsDNA contaminating fragments,” he writes.

In that Substack article, McKernan has also copied a 2009 study discussing how DNA in vaccines can cause cancer and highlighted the most relevant parts. It’s a helpful resource if you want to learn more. [Substack article]

Quality Control Is Sorely Lacking

As for how SV40 promoters ended up in the mRNA shots, it appears to be related to poor quality control during the manufacturing process, although it’s unclear where in the development SV40 might have sneaked in. Quality control deficiencies may also be responsible for the high rate of anaphylactic reactions we’ve been seeing.

McKernan tells Greer:

“It’s in both Moderna and Pfizer. We looked at the bivalent vaccines for both Moderna and Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer because we didn’t have access to monovalent vaccines for Moderna. In all three cases, the vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination.

If you sequence that DNA, you’ll find that it matches what looks to be an expression vector that’s used to make the RNA … Whenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there’s any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected.

And, of course … there’s a lot of anaphylaxis going on, not only on TV but in the VAERS database. You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNA …”

Regulatory Agencies Knew There Was a Contamination Problem

McKernan also points out that Pfizer itself submitted evidence to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) showing sampled lots contained vast differences in the levels of double-stranded DNA contamination.

The concern that people, even at the FDA, have noted in the past whenever injecting double-stranded DNA, is that these things can integrate into the genome. ~ Kevin McKernan

The arbitrary limit for dsDNA that the EMA came up with was 330 nanograms per milligram (ng/mg). Data submitted to the EMA by Pfizer shows sampled lots had anywhere from 1 ng/mg to 815 ng/mg of DNA. McKernan adds:

“This limit likely did not consider the potency of this dsDNA contamination if it was packaged in an LNP [lipid nanoparticle]. Packaged dsDNA is more potent as a gene therapy. We now know this DNA is packaged and transfection ready. Even lower limits should be applied if the DNA is packaged in transfection ready LNPs …

Even with Pfizer being able to cherry pick the data they provided to the EMA for 10 lots, they see a 1 to 815 ng/mg variance. If you were to expand this study to 100 or 1000 lots, you’d likely see another order or two of magnitude variance.”

Double-Stranded DNA May Integrate Into Your Genome

The presence of double-stranded DNA also brings up another major concern, and that is the possibility of genomic integration.

“At least on the Pfizer side of things, it has what’s known as an SV40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus piece. It’s not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people, even at the FDA, have noted in the past whenever injecting double-stranded DNA, is that these things can integrate into the genome,” McKernan says.

While McKernan’s paper does not present evidence of genome integration, it does point out that it’s possible, especially in the presence of SV40 promoters:

“There has been a healthy debate about the capacity for SARs-CoV-2 to integrate into the human genome … This work has inspired questions regarding the capacity for the mRNA vaccines to also genome integrate. Such an event would require LINE-1 driven reverse transcription of the mRNA into DNA as described by Alden et al.

dsDNA [double-stranded DNA] contamination of sequence encoding the spike protein wouldn’t require LINE-1 for Reverse Transcription and the presence of an SV40 nuclear localization signal in Pfizer’s vaccine vector would further increase the odds of integration.”

Manifold Risks

That said, even if genetic modification does not occur, the fact that you’re getting foreign DNA into your cells poses a risk in and of itself, McKernan says. For example, partial expression could occur, or it might interfere with other transcription translations that are already in the cell.

Bhakdi also points out that the SV40 promoters do not need to be present in the nucleus of the cell for problems to occur. Cytoplasmic transfection can, in and of itself, allow for genetic manipulation, because the nucleus disassembles and exchanges cellular components with the cytosol during cell division.

In addition to having DNA floating around and causing potential problems, the RNA in the COVID jab is also modified to resist breakdown. “So, we have TWO versions of the spike protein floating around that can persist longer than anticipated,” McKernan says, and the spike protein, of course, is the most toxic part of the virus that can cause your body to attack itself.

Both McKernan and Bhakdi are adamant that ALL mRNA “vaccines” must be immediately stopped, whether for human or animal use, due to the magnitude of the risks involved.

‘Alarming Problems’

“The Pfizer vaccine has a staggering problem,” Murakami says. “This figure is an enlarged view of Pfizer’s vaccine sequence. As you can see, the Pfizer vaccine sequence contains part of the SV40 sequence here. This sequence is known as a promoter.

Roughly speaking, the promoter causes increased expression of the gene. The problem is that the sequence is present in a well-known carcinogenic virus. The question is why such a sequence that is derived from a cancer virus is present in Pfizer’s vaccine.

There should be absolutely no need for such a carcinogenic virus sequence in the vaccine. This sequence is totally unnecessary for producing the mRNA vaccine. It is a problem that such a sequence is solidly contained in the vaccine.

This is not the only problem. If a sequence like this is present in the DNA, the DNA is easily migrated to the nucleus. So it means that the DNA can easily enter the genome. This is such an alarming problem.

It is essential to remove the sequence. However, Pfizer produced the vaccine without removing the sequence. That is outrageously malicious. This kind of promoter sequence is completely unnecessary for the production of the mRNA vaccine. In fact, SV40 is a promoter of cancer viruses.”

Editor: I decided to see what ChatGPT had to say about the subject of free DNA in a cell. This is the question and response:

Question: Is free DNA in the cell dangerous?

ChatGPT:

Free DNA in the cell refers to DNA that is not enclosed within the nucleus or other cellular compartments. This can include extracellular DNA released from damaged cells, circulating cell-free DNA, or DNA fragments present in the cytoplasm.

The potential danger or harm associated with free DNA in the cell depends on the specific context and circumstances. Here are a few scenarios where free DNA can have different implications:

1. Cell Damage: When cells are damaged due to injury, infection, or cell death, they can release their contents, including DNA, into the surrounding environment. In such cases, the presence of free DNA may trigger an immune response as the body recognizes it as a sign of cell damage or danger. This immune response can contribute to inflammation and tissue damage.

2. Infection: Certain bacteria and other microorganisms can release DNA into their surroundings as part of their normal biological processes. This extracellular DNA can have various roles, including promoting biofilm formation or facilitating horizontal gene transfer among bacteria. In the context of infection, the release of free DNA can contribute to the virulence and persistence of certain pathogens.

3. Cancer and Genetic Mutations: In cancer, the presence of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the bloodstream is of particular interest. Tumor cells can release DNA fragments into the circulation, which can contain genetic mutations specific to the tumor. cfDNA can be used as a diagnostic tool to detect the presence of cancer or monitor treatment response. While the presence of cfDNA in itself is not dangerous, the genetic mutations it carries can provide valuable information about the tumor’s characteristics.

4. Genetic Engineering: In the field of genetic engineering and biotechnology, the deliberate introduction of free DNA into cells is a common practice. This is often done to insert foreign genes or modify existing ones to confer specific traits or produce desired proteins. While the introduction of exogenous DNA can have intended consequences, it should be done under controlled conditions and with proper safety measures to prevent unintended effects or risks.

Overall, the presence of free DNA in the cell can have different implications depending on the specific context. It is important to consider the source, nature, and purpose of the free DNA, as well as the potential consequences and risks associated with its presence.

by Clinton Ober

Earthing restores and maintains the human body’s most natural electrical state, which in turn promotes optimum health and functionality in daily life. The primordial natural energy emanating from the Earth is the ultimate anti-inflammatory and the ultimate anti-aging medicine.

ELECTRICAL YOU AND YOUR ELECTRICAL PLANET

Have you ever noticed a subtle tingling or sensation of warmth rising up from your feet during a barefoot stroll on a sandy beach or grassy field glistening with the morning dew?

Did you feel revitalized at the end of your walk?

If you did, you experienced the Earth energizing your body. The fact is, is that we live on a planet alive with natural energies. Its surface teems with subtly pulsating frequencies, a phenomenon unknown to most people. Who regards the sand, grass, sidewalk, or dirt beneath their feet as an energy field? (more…)